In 2011, the government of the province of Córdoba, Argentina, decided to upgrade a large part of its natural gas distribution network. This upgrade would require extending the current 2000 km pipeline network. A topographic surveying company, Del Bianco Associates (Del Bianco), was tasked with providing preliminary topographical studies for project engineering, including reviewing, updating and completing information on 1,580 km of pipeline alignments.
After a series of topographic studies, the 2011 project was cancelled due to a lack of funding from the state government. By then, Del Bianco had collected 160,000 field points used to generate a georeferenced data base. These field points enabled teams to proceed with preliminary development of project engineering. The work resumed in 2017, when Del Bianco carried out a series of surveys to complete and update the project data. Del Blanco used the Spectra Precision SP60 GNSS receiver and a Spectra Precision T41 Data Collector in combination with Trimble CenterPoint RTX correction service. They used Trimble Data Transfer Utility software for communication and to download the data.
The client required accuracy of 30 cm or better for x, y and z coordinates of the trunk lines. The project deliverables were topographic maps in georeferenced AutoCAD format. The field work was done at an average of 580 meters above sea level, with a deviation of 350 meters above or below this value. The actual pipeline routes often passed through agricultural fields. Under these circumstances using CenterPoint RTX, Del Bianco was able to meet nominal accuracy values of 2 cm for horizontal measurements and 5 cm for elevation measurements. “The accuracies achieved are perfect for our topographic surveying work,” says Del Bianco Director Omar Serantes.
Also Read: COVID-19 has made location a common language: Gladys Kong CEO, UberMedia
After using the POSGAR 2007 reference framework for verifying the accuracy of the pipeline routes, it became clear that RTX was more effective and cost-efficient than RTK, adds Serantes. “Because we work anywhere in the country, we sometimes have to travel multiple days to reach the work site. Compared to RTK GNSS, RTX takes less space in our pickup truck, which leaves room for another surveying assistant. With RTK GNSS, we would need another team member since RTK requires installing a base receiver. We have to provide accommodations for the team member, which increases our per diem expense.”
trace to generate basic engineering plans.
Using RTK also requires the construction of additional support systems, which adds time and money, because data collection comes to a stop if one operates outside the radio’s range. “This means you must return to the base station, transfer the equipment ahead to the next control point and establish a new base station,” Serantes explains. “RTX does not require additional support systems or supervision of the base stations so you can start work immediately after initialization. This enables us to reduce time in the field by as much as 50 percent, which gives us a competitive edge in the market.” A further advantage to using RTX is that GNSS post-processing is not necessary because the data is collected in real-time and is downloadable and ready to use, adds Serantes.
Today, Del Bianco uses the Spectra Precision SP60 GNSS receiver and RTX equipment for all its projects. ”We use RTX at 2100 m above sea level, where you can reach each property’s corner points without relying on the RTK radio signal for a fixed solution. In the mountains, there is always the risk of not receiving a fixed solution. When this happens, you are forced to suspend work. After moving the base station to a nearby point, you can generate new auxiliary points. Such alternatives in the field always take more time. RTX offers a solution anywhere.”
Also Read: Surveyors measure coastal erosion using UAS survey and software technology
